Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 18:27
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 791
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.1 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.9
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 286 286 288 283 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,471
Mixed 561
SusWrite 340
234% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 57.3
236% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 795
696% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 218%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
309GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 458 276 248 248 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 462
Mixed 376
SusWrite 325
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 40.7
156% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 320
242% 325 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
36GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 77
Mixed 83.5
119% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.1
195% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%
Corsair Voyager Mini 3.0 32GB
10GB free, PID 1a0c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 20 19 17 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 150
Write 45.6
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 18.9
54% 56 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G4D30AEEA.K8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback