PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus Extreme (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090324 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 01 '18 at 15:16 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
28.5%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 200 201 201 207 218 MB/s
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 51 47 46 49 MB/s
|
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
36.1%
Below average
|
||||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
5GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 70 76 68 55 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
5GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 53 54 53 51 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.3 MB/s
|
4.99%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 20x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 4x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $253 |