Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 13:23
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 235
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 725
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 111
Parallax 93.8
81% 102 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 95.4
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 977 971 1007 1086 1048 1038 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,028
Mixed 735
SusWrite 1,021
229% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 63.4
215% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 931
720% 986 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 227%
Great: 353%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
29GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 219 209 136 232 247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 360
Write 271
Mixed 273
SusWrite 210
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 41.2
155% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 242
193% 269 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 113 114 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 114
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 113
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 104%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
951GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 153 154 151 155 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 164
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 154
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.7
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 122%
USB DISK 3.0 126GB
112GB free, PID 6300, KINGSTICK USB DISK 3.0 128GB
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 11 25 28 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 92.2
Write 5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 22.6
38% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback