Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 12:44
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 285
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 867
87% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 190
Parallax 171
136% 176 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 171
Splatting 0.09
70% 97.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 48 49 99 74 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 475
Write 106
Mixed 124
SusWrite 69.2
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 36
155% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 32
71% 153 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
247GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 477 473 471 476 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 480
Mixed 389
SusWrite 476
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.6
219% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 133%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
7GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 153
Write 172
Mixed 39.5
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
829GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 139 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 172
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 139
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 26.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback