HP AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 0A7C
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 12:00
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 52
1-Core 9.4
2-Core 10.1
21% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 12.7
8-Core 10.5
2% 11.6 Pts
64-Core 16.5
1% 16.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
MSI(1462 7297) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.19
0% 0.16 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 12 14 7.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 24
Write 17.6
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 12.4
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
9.71% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0.2
0% 0.07 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback