User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 02:11
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.23% Terrible
1-Core 6.1
2-Core 12.2
4% 9.15 Pts
4-Core 19.3
8-Core 21.2
3% 20.2 Pts
64-Core 20.9
1% 20.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 18%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 24GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.52.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 76 70 59 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 322
Write 75.5
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 66.9
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 6.2
24% 7.63 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 9.1
10% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 267
15% 267 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $60
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $207
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback