Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 21:31
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 711
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 187
95% 133 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 125
Splatting 134
98% 118 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,908
Write 1,359
Mixed 508
276% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 56.2
210% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 829
647% 900 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
152GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 111 103 104 110 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 305
Write 198
Mixed 173
SusWrite 113
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 28.3
102% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 45.4
84% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
168GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 443 460 468 468 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 454
Mixed 394
SusWrite 453
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.8
190% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
72GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 247 120 97 79 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 465
Mixed 336
SusWrite 181
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 54.5
186% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 345
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 112 119 115 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 70
SusWrite 116
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback