Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '18 at 21:17
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 204 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 476 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 189 Parallax 173 138% 177 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 173 Splatting 126 114% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,146 Write 4,452 Mixed 4634 1,058% 4,744 MB/s	4K Read 337 4K Write 228 4K Mixed 254 957% 273 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 580 DQ Mixed 664 500% 673 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Kingston SHFS37A480G 480GB 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 171GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 279 244 234 236 219 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 363 Write 299 Mixed 333 SusWrite 251 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 22.6 93% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 145 115% 164 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 115GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 110 109 110 110 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 182 Write 156 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 109 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	131x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16