Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '18 at 00:50
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 145 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 410 41% 334 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 192 170 180 160 176 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 301 Write 168 Mixed 190 SusWrite 177 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 12 68% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 70.9 83% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 5.4 5.4 5.1 4.8 5.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Read 30 Write 5.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 4.9 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 M391B5273DH0-YH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W510 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510

CPU
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples	12x
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples	11x
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	9x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	9x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	7x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 2TBSamsung $275Bench 113%, 44,466 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
S3 250G 250GBSandiskBench 87%, 1,221 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	4x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	4x
M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16GBSamsungBench 48%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16