PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161101 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 30 '18 at 20:50 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 228 262 213 199 364 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
32.6%
Below average
|
||||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
225GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 125 126 126 126 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 483x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 113x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 122x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 93x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $960 |