Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 880 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 48.4 1-Core 110 2-Core 208 65% 122 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 781 67% 573 Pts	64-Core 1,999 124% 1,999 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 82%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 257 332 329 334 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 238 Write 286 Mixed 177 SusWrite 301 57% 250 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 16.4 76% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 99.9 85% 128 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CH9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 HMT31GR7B... 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.2% Very good	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 29.7 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 4 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16