Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 22:09
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$171
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 744
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
MSI(1462 2874) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.6
17% 20.1 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 24
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 301 308 311 312 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 483
256% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 96.5
347% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 169
400% 808 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 250%
Great: 280%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
87GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 58.3
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 58.1
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
563GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 80 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 81.3
Write 81.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 81.7
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 28.7
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback