Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 210 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 631 64% 519 Pts	64-Core 624 39% 624 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Zotac(19DA 1503) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	144% Outstanding	Lighting 194 Reflection 216 Parallax 237 158% 216 fps	MRender 230 Gravity 208 Splatting 128 148% 189 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 174%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 103 100 93 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 428 Write 160 Mixed 141 SusWrite 100 45% 207 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 27.7 115% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 152 128% 193 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB 706 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.8% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.4 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $656

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16