Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 06:33
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 223
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 909
82% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3400 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 18.4
16% 20.3 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 25.7
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 814 788 788 814 804 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,836
Write 907
Mixed 624
SusWrite 799
230% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 54.3
212% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 378
358% 581 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 217%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
230GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 397 402 398 394 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 390
Mixed 413
SusWrite 400
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.5
186% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 135%
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 176 179 178 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 93%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 142 150 154 138 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 151 151 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 114
Write 136
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 153
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
309% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77%
Great: 107%
ASMT 2105 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 154 154 156 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 160
Write 123
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 155
170% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
241% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB-$530
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 42.5
138% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 121%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback