Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 138 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 59.4 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 180 61% 110 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 564 55% 452 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 36.3 33% 38.6 fps	MRender 49.8 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 38.3 33% 41.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 107GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 236 243 235 195 167 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 29GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 65% null MHz 16384, 14328 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 39.9 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16