Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 15:40
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 556
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 66.3
56% 67.7 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 54.3
51% 63 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 133 97 89 66 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 408
Write 250
Mixed 268
SusWrite 103
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 31.3
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 32.6
32% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 97%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN5 256GB
157GB free
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 232 278 201 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 448
Write 416
Mixed 374
SusWrite 222
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 30.9
105% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 153
89% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 103 113 86 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 89.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96.5
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
361GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 69 71 63 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 114
Write 100
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 69.4
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
397GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 94 106 78 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.6
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1.5TB
104GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 39 39 35 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 59.8
Write 57.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 38.5
57% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $332
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback