Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 467
62% 467 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.6
31% 35 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37
Splatting 34.5
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 135 151 155 174 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 287
Write 168
Mixed 198
SusWrite 158
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 25.3
97% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 129
124% 197 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
655GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 163 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 164
Mixed 93
SusWrite 161
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD103SJ 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 3A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 103 103 104 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 100
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 37%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 43.2
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 139
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
3TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 124 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 74
SusWrite 123
151% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback