Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 23:04
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 170
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 329
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 21.6
14% 18.5 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.4
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 447
Mixed 288
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 40.4
133% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 177
185% 303 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
333GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 234 237 239 239 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.8% Good
Read 254
Write 243
Mixed 210
SusWrite 235
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 35.8
116% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
726GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 134 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 130
Write 123
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 131
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
838GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 131 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 118
Write 136
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 132
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 1TB
49GB free, PID 10a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 66
Mixed 45
SusWrite 63.8
81% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 43%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
27GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 23.8
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback