Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 74 2-Core 149 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 369 43% 332 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Dell(1028 153F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 4.16 3% 3.46 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 5.43 4% 4.52 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 512GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 345 353 348 349 348 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 401 Write 349 Mixed 265 SusWrite 349 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 18.4 60% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 153 125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 458 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 16 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	127x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	80x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	72x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	18x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	11x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	10x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	17x
NT8GC64B8HB0NS-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 52%, 612 samples	15x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 52%, 422 samples	10x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16