Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 245
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 720
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 78.8
Parallax 68.7
59% 73.4 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 63.7
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2170002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 414
Mixed 265
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 38
156% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 148
154% 254 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 299 301 268 249 257 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 452
Mixed 399
SusWrite 294
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.3
210% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
86GB free
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 285 296 311 316 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 473
Write 308
Mixed 222
SusWrite 303
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 15.6
126% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 85.5
106% 183 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
7GB free
Firmware: Z2320000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 310
Mixed 235
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 15.2
119% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 86.2
104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 184 190 189 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 136
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 184
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 183 199 202 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 167
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 191
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $958
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback