Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 44.9 2-Core 116 51% 81.2 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 160 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 7360) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 26.2 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 31.4 21% 29.2 fps	MRender 26.3 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 30.9 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 7,201 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 182 183 182 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 338 Write 196 Mixed 190 SusWrite 180 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 25.5 83% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 180 142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 2x4GB 2,435 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	140x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	47x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	34x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $289

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16