PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120629 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 24 '18 at 15:10 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
77.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 203 175 178 189 184 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
|||
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 102 104 105 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
|||
WD 5000KS External 500GB
63GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 115x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 98x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 41x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 47x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $526 |