ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2344CJG

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2344CJG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2344CJG
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '18 at 09:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 160 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 235 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M 1,652 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.89 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 0.94 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100 901 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 133 127 106 116 113 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.6% Above average	Read 235 Write 186 Mixed 206 SusWrite 122 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 26.5 89% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 167 129% 175 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 81%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 112 114 114 112 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 76.4 Write 79.5 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 111 59% 80 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 170% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 345GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 102 Write 96.4 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 107 61% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 12 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback