ECS H77H2-M3

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H77H2-M3 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '18 at 19:11
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60 21,413 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 258 41% 296 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 36.7 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 35.7 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 145 155 151 129 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 346 Write 185 Mixed 227 SusWrite 144 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 28.3 95% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 166 124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 84%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 13GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 65 53 51 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 57.3 Mixed 44 SusWrite 60.1 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 537GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 110 111 110 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 108 Write 116 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 110 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77H2-M3 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H77H2-M3

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	16x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	5x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	5x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	3x
256G 256GBHs-ssd-e3000Bench 186%, 497 samples	3x

RAM
99U5403-159.A01LF 0080 16GBHynixBench 57%, 5 samples	5x
Hynix 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 6 samples	4x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16