| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170922 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 23 '18 at 19:05 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
88% 156 Pts
|
63% 499 Pts
|
42% 687 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
31% 34.8 fps
|
30% 36.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 48 51 11 22 52 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
64% 287 MB/s
|
122% 49.1 MB/s
|
154% 233 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
777GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 181 187 188 188 183 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
104% 144 MB/s
|
136% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
12GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
8.02%
Terrible
|
13% 13.3 MB/s
|
27% 2.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.6%
Good
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
62% 21.6 GB/s
|
64% 62.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,919 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,115x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 639x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 554x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 841x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 469x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 367x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |