Asus P8Z68 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 413
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.59
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 27 41 36 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 257
Write 38.8
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 37.2
22% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 15
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 44.1
56% 106 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 73%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 154
Write 108
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 74.8
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 76 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 173
Write 106
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 74.4
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 27
Write 27.2
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 17.9
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 94 94 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 94.6
122% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
673GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 23.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 15.8
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL7-4GBSR CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL7-4GBSR 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $766
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback