Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 159 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 303 41% 304 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 297 296 287 193 181 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 466 Mixed 383 SusWrite 276 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 43.3 139% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 300 226% 301 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 124%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 133GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 59 60 65 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 61.7 Write 61.7 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 61.7 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 Team--Elite-1333 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17.3 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16