Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 114 50% 82 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0410) 1.5GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM06D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 123 173 59 61 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 148 Write 209 Mixed 140 SusWrite 107 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 9.5 44% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 21.6 DQ Mixed 15.9 24% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.4 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	5x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	1x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16