HP 23-q153d

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-q153d  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B45
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 06:33
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 590
59% 479 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B45) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7
6% 8.15 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 14.5
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 172 133 162 137 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 29.4
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 158
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback