Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 22:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 686
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.9
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 17.7
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 203 197 194 197 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 435
Mixed 361
SusWrite 223
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 52.3
174% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
163GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 64 64 59 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 27.8
Write 42
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 62.5
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26%
Great: 59%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 640GB
551GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 179 186 185 182 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 86
SusWrite 184
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
274% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback