Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 15:09
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3430-$54
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 88.9
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 148
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 181
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1568 MHz, MLim: 1962 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 77
Parallax 67.3
56% 71 fps
MRender 81.9
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 60.8
55% 68.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 111 121 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 293
Write 283
Mixed 239
SusWrite 115
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 22.6
91% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 147
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 115 125 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 337
Write 331
Mixed 193
SusWrite 117
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 36.5
113% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 192
145% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
430GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 110 123 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 114
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 112%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
98GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 110 112 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61% Good
Read 103
Write 109
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 110
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61%
Great: 86%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
523GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 103 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 177
Write 152
Mixed 114
SusWrite 103
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback