Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP7

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP7 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120830
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '18 at 09:57
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 213 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 534 58% 461 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 57 Parallax 50.2 44% 53.7 fps	MRender 51.5 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 57.9 44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 70 70 69 80 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 313 Write 181 Mixed 194 SusWrite 79.2 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 29 102% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 90 80% 122 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: AY00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 105 108 107 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 113 Write 113 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 106 67% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 18.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77X-UP7 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP7

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	60x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	5x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	7x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x

SSD
Savage 120GBHyperX $80Bench 86%, 7,194 samples	17x
Z400s 128GBSanDisk $109Bench 61%, 10,807 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A 500GBWDCBench 98%, 24,830 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	17x
CMD16GX3M2A1866C9 Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 029E CMD16GX3M2A1866C9 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 28GBUnknownBench 32%, 7 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 63%, 2,772 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $314

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16