Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 07:23
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 174
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 449
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.38
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.52
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAC128M 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0509
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 168 174 175 183 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 368
Write 170
Mixed 206
SusWrite 171
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 15.2
82% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 17.3
42% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
114GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 72 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 89.6
Write 94.9
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 71
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
396GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 112 113 113 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 62
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W510 POWER Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback