PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151016 |
Uptime | 11.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 22 '18 at 01:41 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 172 53 52 51 47 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
336GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 74 75 70 71 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
41.9%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
73.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 346x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 268x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 79x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 134x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 83x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 75x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $599 |