Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 21:20
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 987
89% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,347
83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 69.6
57% 70.1 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 55
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 291 292 294 296 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 483
Mixed 375
SusWrite 312
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 52.2
188% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 369
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
203GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 80 78 82 81 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 497
Write 124
Mixed 375
SusWrite 128
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 32.7
130% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 193
179% 272 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 102%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB
169GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 82 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 132
Write 106
Mixed 115
SusWrite 79.2
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 31.2
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 28
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback