Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 682
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 366F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 63.4
59% 69 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 56.3
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 143 126 135 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 485
Write 194
Mixed 188
SusWrite 135
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 23
97% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 91.2
89% 148 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 76%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
165GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 572 602 609 605 606 611 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 757
Write 630
Mixed 538
SusWrite 601
142% 632 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 74.8
260% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 918
632% 782 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 179%
Great: 353%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
83GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 28.5
Write 46
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 63.3
28% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 198 192 193 199 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 206
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 195
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
24GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 50.3
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 41
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 58%
Generic Mass-Storage 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 11 9.3 11 8.6 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 3.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 9.2
11% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2
87% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback