Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '18 at 10:19
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 77 1-Core 130 2-Core 258 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 922 85% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,352 84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 46.4 Reflection 32 Parallax 38.4 38% 38.9 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 36.8 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 654 656 661 659 657 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,290 Write 2,125 Mixed 1,555 SusWrite 701 373% 1,667 MB/s	4K Read 51.6 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 72.1 243% 87.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,054 DQ Write 881 DQ Mixed 963 723% 966 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 206GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 482 483 483 483 483 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 484 Mixed 370 SusWrite 483 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 54 192% 69.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 371 279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 325GB free Firmware: M0CR050 SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 475 383 376 377 377 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 467 Mixed 385 SusWrite 411 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 37.5 143% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 345 258% 343 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 147 149 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 138 Write 141 Mixed 105 SusWrite 148 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 240GB free Firmware: AR15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 87 97 98 96 98 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 129GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 30 88 89 88 88 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 42GB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 92 92 90 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 89GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 85 85 84 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 84.3 Write 87.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 84 51% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 370GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 98 98 99 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 94.3 Write 102 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 97.7 57% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 107%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$11 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 9GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 46 46 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 93.2 Write 45.8 Mixed 34 SusWrite 45.4 66% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 55% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 39%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13 599 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 56 52 64 37 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 99.7 Write 16 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 48.5 53% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 88% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.4% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,404x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	206x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	244x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16