| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 45.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130207 |
| Uptime | 12.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '18 at 05:03 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
|
42.4%
Average
|
31% 50.8 Pts
|
39% 341 Pts
|
31% 503 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32%
Below average
|
31% 44.1 fps
|
34% 43.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 143 134 145 147 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
36% 160 MB/s
|
48% 15.7 MB/s
|
52% 77.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9965516-121.A00LF 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
49.1%
Average
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
13% 4.5 GB/s
|
23% 171 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,396 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 150x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 147x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 129x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 169x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 95x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |