Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '18 at 03:06
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 177 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 471 47% 385 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.4% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 48.7 Parallax 56.9 39% 51.3 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 43.6 Splatting 35 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 70 50 52 52 49 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 243 Write 189 Mixed 194 SusWrite 70.2 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 22 98% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 23.9 27% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 759GB free Firmware: JP4OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 130 130 131 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 121 Write 132 Mixed 69 SusWrite 130 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 74%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 466GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 45.5 Write 27 Mixed 34 SusWrite 45 28% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 40% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR 1066 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	71x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	118x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16