Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 11:17
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 863
90% 723 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 118
Parallax 99.9
91% 110 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 198 206 196 186 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 258
Mixed 269
SusWrite 192
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 43.1
172% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 240
187% 259 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 310 312 311 310 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,453
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 484
308% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 83
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 1,495
DQ Mixed 990
817% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 271%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
623GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 184 186 185 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 146
Mixed 74
SusWrite 185
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 8.2 8.1 7.4 8.2 7.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.5
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback