Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '18 at 10:04
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 239 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 874 80% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,281 79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 201 Parallax 178 146% 186 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 180 Splatting 130 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 796GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1783 1268 1262 1269 1266 1263 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	307% Outstanding	Read 2,494 Write 2,216 Mixed 1,569 SusWrite 1,352 427% 1908 MB/s	4K Read 63.4 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 83.8 278% 95.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,000 DQ Write 738 DQ Mixed 846 639% 862 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 307% Great: 372%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$229 679 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 93 93 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 108 Write 96 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 92.1 68% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 101%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 147 137 144 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 118 Write 111 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 141 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.7 228% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 99 99 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 87.5 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 97.8 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 85%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 770GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 135 135 137 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 111 Write 69.8 Mixed 81 SusWrite 134 73% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 40 23 24 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 127 Write 39.2 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 37 76% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.7 141% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 38%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 8GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 8.3 12 14 37 12 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 246 Write 42.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 28.6 70% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 8.4 677% 6.63 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 12.2 DQ Mixed 10.1 804% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3466C16 4x8GB 1,229 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.5% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 25.3 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16