Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$44 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 154 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 267 32% 248 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 482 477 484 474 482 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 475 Mixed 405 SusWrite 479 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 59.3 211% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 134%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB 1,823 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 12 14 14 13 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	5.99% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 10.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 11.6 15% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.99% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB 2,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	119x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	67x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	37x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16