Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 21:35
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 245
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 741
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 188
Parallax 182
134% 178 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 169
Splatting 123
111% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 199 182 177 169 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 484
Mixed 402
SusWrite 204
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.1
200% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 355
269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
73GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 448 435 476 487 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 468
Mixed 444
SusWrite 463
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.3
186% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 350
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
1GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.5
10% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.3
204% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 25.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 24.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback