Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '18 at 20:39
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 712 65% 544 Pts	64-Core 1,075 67% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6262) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 65.9 63% 73 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 70.7 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 60%
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB; GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 33 Parallax 40.9 28% 35.9 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 31.7 Splatting 35.1 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 304 302 303 299 299 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,906 Write 1,427 Mixed 747 SusWrite 476 252% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 52 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 59.7 230% 84.3 MB/s	DQ Read 866 DQ Write 777 DQ Mixed 776 594% 806 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 236%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 84GB free Firmware: CS900212 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 231 292 233 290 233 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 221 Write 98.6 Mixed 122 SusWrite 262 40% 176 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 20.7 89% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 148 120% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 309GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 157 159 159 160 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 149 Write 118 Mixed 80.1 SusWrite 158 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 212GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 141 140 140 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 146 Mixed 104 SusWrite 145 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 214GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 91.3 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 84%
WD My Passport 07A8 500GB 1,257 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 144GB free, PID 07a8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 92 93 94 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 100 Write 96.2 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 93.2 117% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 8.1 8.2 8 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 66.4 Write 27.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 9.5 29% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 39% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 35%
EDGE DiskGO 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 12 12 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	8.66% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 3.3 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 10.2 11% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.7 109% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 93.5 43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)