Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 20:27
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 360
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 43.1
36% 43.9 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 149 102 84 82 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 329
Write 212
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 130
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 22.5
76% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 170
148% 218 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 71.5
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 5.8
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.3
6% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.9 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.4
6% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback