HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory17.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130327
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 01:50
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 150
56% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 305
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 45.5
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 37.9
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 44 43 46 44 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 434
Write 406
Mixed 338
SusWrite 56.3
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 32.7
111% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 214
192% 292 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 118%
Intel SSDSC2BA200G3 200GB
33GB free
Firmware: 0270
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 226 230 237 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 239
Write 228
Mixed 198
SusWrite 231
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 25.2
83% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 163
122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57%
Great: 97%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
46GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 75
Write 72.3
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 73.5
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
144GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 78 78 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 79.7
71% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
731GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 63 71 72 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 54.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 68.5
75% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback