ECT H77MU3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT H77MU3  (all builds)
MotherboardBIOSTAR H77MU3
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120425
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 21:31
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 491
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 32.1
18% 25.7 fps
MRender 31.6
Gravity 27
Splatting 23.5
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 182 201 188 201 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 410
Write 206
Mixed 202
SusWrite 193
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 19.2
72% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 113
100% 157 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
716GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 96 98 99 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 71.8
Write 66.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 94.8
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
966GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 96 100 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 65
SusWrite 95.1
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%
Generic Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.3 3.7 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 2.8
8% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 9%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB
57GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 78 69 82 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 88.5
Write 79.2
Mixed 75
SusWrite 75.9
107% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.1
270% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST51264BA1339.8FED 859B ST51264BA1339.8FED 859B ST51264BA1339.16FD 859B ST51264BA1339.8FED 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77MU3 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: ECT H77MU3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $538
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback