Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 21:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 441
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 115
Parallax 98
84% 105 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 102
82% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 168 205 219 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.6% Very good
Read 247
Write 237
Mixed 208
SusWrite 207
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.6
148% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 52.5
44% 61 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
144GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 229 229 234 234 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.6% Very good
Read 243
Write 233
Mixed 236
SusWrite 228
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 45.9
143% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 52.7
44% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 125%
WD DM000 External 2TB
3TB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 28.8
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-002.A00LF 9905458-002.A00LF 9905458-002.A00LF 9905458-002.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $776
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback