Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 18 '18 at 08:35
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 346
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte(1458 379D) 3GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 41.2
32% 36.7 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 30.4
26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128M6G-2280 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 279 302 302 318 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 322
Mixed 258
SusWrite 301
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 40
145% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 181
170% 264 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
173GB free
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 344 372 375 375 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 408
Mixed 391
SusWrite 373
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 27.2
130% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 42.4
96% 195 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
576GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45% Average
Read 78.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 78.1
57% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
536GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 83 83 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 97
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 82.2
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
783GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 136
75% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
283GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 83 83 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 82.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 82.3
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback