Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '18 at 23:35
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 103 2-Core 203 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 465 63% 471 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1935 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (41 fps cap detected)	34.1% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 35.2 Parallax 40.1 35% 39.3 fps	MRender 41.4 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 39.2 33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 338 358 353 366 365 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 375 Write 342 Mixed 249 SusWrite 345 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 30.9 114% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 267 219% 313 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 117%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 55GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,556 Write 1,267 Mixed 451 240% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 39.2 154% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 1,158 DQ Mixed 722 644% 964 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 931GB free Firmware: JA0OA5M0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 98 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 98.4 Write 99.5 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 98.2 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 142 142 143 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 142 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 82%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 3.2 4.1 3.7 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Read 21 Write 20.3 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 3.6 18% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 6%
Mass Storage Device 64GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 57GB free, PID 125c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 9.9 11 16 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 8.8 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 13.6 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 55% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 4,251 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	396x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $722

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16